Linux ChromeBox Kodi E-Z Setup Script (LibreELEC/Linux+Kodi) [2017/02/21] - Printable Version +- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv) +-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=222) +--- Forum: Hardware (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=112) +--- Thread: Linux ChromeBox Kodi E-Z Setup Script (LibreELEC/Linux+Kodi) [2017/02/21] (/showthread.php?tid=194362) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
|
RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - Netix - 2014-10-18 (2014-10-18, 19:48)JD2k3 Wrote: Hey Matt, Same issue here.. any idea ? RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - Matt Devo - 2014-10-18 (2014-10-18, 19:48)JD2k3 Wrote: Hey Matt, (2014-10-18, 20:04)Netix Wrote: Same issue here.. any idea ? assuming you have your stock firmware backed up, you can: 1) boot to another OS (on USB) that can run the full EZ setup script, which can extract the MAC address info from a stock firmware backup file. 2) if the above doesn't work, re-flash your stock firmware, then re-run the EZ setup script to flash the coreboot firmware (no reboot needed in between the two flashes) or, if you don't have a stock firmware backup or don't care about the unique MAC address: 3) re-run the standalone updater script now that I've modified it to just make the MAC address persistence a warning vs an error RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - JD2k3 - 2014-10-18 (2014-10-18, 20:51)Matt Devo Wrote: assuming you have your stock firmware backed up, you can: Thanks for the quick fix option 3 worked fine this time RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - Loicvan - 2014-10-18 Just trying to install openelec and even though I see the menu with sandisk ssd and my usb key, esc does nothing and then it wants to start from the internal ssd. I even tried different keyboards. Why can't I choose the usb key to boot (I tried several keys too)? the bios is SeaBIOS 20141016 from Matt. It just doesn't wait at all and try to boot right away from the ssd, and hangs. RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - Matt Devo - 2014-10-18 (2014-10-18, 23:03)Loicvan Wrote: Just trying to install openelec and even though I see the menu with sandisk ssd and my usb key, esc does nothing and then it wants to start from the internal ssd. I even tried different keyboards. Why can't I choose the usb key to boot (I tried several keys too)? the bios is SeaBIOS 20141016 from Matt. It just doesn't wait at all and try to boot right away from the ssd, and hangs. that doesn't make sense - you don't see the menu with boot devices unless you first hit ESC, so if you are seeing the menu, it is recognizing you pressing ESC. Once you hit ESC and the menu is displayed, the only inputs that are recognized are the numbers corresponding to the displayed boot devices. Prior to the display of the boot menu, if you hit any key other than ESC, it will immediately boot the first boot device (internal HDD) RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - mdumont1 - 2014-10-19 (2014-10-15, 04:15)xi_Slick_ix Wrote: First off, big thanks to Matt Devo. I have a similar setup with a Pioneer receiver and have the same issues. It sounds like it affects all Pioneer HDMI receivers connected to a 4th gen Intel NUC. It seems that there is an Intel driver issue when running at 1080p where the Pioneer receiver won't handshake properly and the sound won't output. If you use a lower resolution the issue goes away. It's actually only 48khz audio that won't play properly (which is most PC audio, passthrough audio seems to work fine) that's why your 2 channel mp3's likely play (since CD's are 44khz). Based on all the other driver issues Intel has to deal with and their lack of updates in various threads on their forum about this issue I doubt it gets fixed anytime soon. There is a thread with more info on the OpenELEC forums about the issue and a workaround fix but unfortunately the fix is only for OpenELEC. The workaround is to have XBMC downsample all non-passthrough audio at 48khz. It's not a great workaround and you probably won't like it if you're an audiophile. For me it works, I can't tell the difference, it mostly only affects the XBMC menus anyways. I have been providing my custom builds with the fix in that thread if you want to try that setup. Here's the thread: http://openelec.tv/forum/68-audio/67773-stereo-audio-not-working-via-hdmi-multichannel-ok RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - Loicvan - 2014-10-19 OK, I was able to get it by pressing 2 right after escape, for some reason it wouldn't wait for me to choose otherwise. All is good. Sorry Matt. RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - xi_Slick_ix - 2014-10-20 (2014-10-19, 01:01)mdumont1 Wrote:(2014-10-15, 04:15)xi_Slick_ix Wrote: First off, big thanks to Matt Devo. Thanks for the info! I'm wondering if we (NUC / Chromebox & Pioneer owners) can't tweak EDID values to effectively override whatever information is being improperly sent or lost. Obviously sending static information all the time to the receiver has some drawbacks compared to the receiver and chromebox dynamically updating as necessary, but it could make a band aid for this issue until the drivers get patched. This would need a different thread as it is really specialized to a subset of users, but seems like it would be applicable to a lot of people. RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - Scott R - 2014-10-22 Just got pointed over to the ChromeBox so I'm a noob on this subject. Just curious if anyone here is familiar with the old Acer Revo 1600 nettop boxes (Intel ATOM / NVIDIA ION) and can tell me in what areas the ChromeBox would offer a real world improvement. I started up threads about the Revo 1600 a long time ago and experimented with Windows XP and Windows 7, and upgraded the RAM on it. I eventually settled on an OpenElec install on the one I use in my living room for streaming full-bitrate Blu-ray rips. But I found it to be too slow to try to run Windows 7 Media Center on, and I still wish I could more easily play Netflix and other apps like that on it, so I pretty much use it in conjunction with either an Apple TV or Amazon Fire TV, and and Xbox 360 (for live TV / PVR - I use Windows Media Center and Plex Media Server on a central server). RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - nickr - 2014-10-22 I have a revo 1600 and two revo 3700's. The 1600 is pretty slow - single core. The ION chipset in it is also inferior in some aspects to the ION2 chipset in the 3700's. The 1600 is in my stepson's room (can't recall what he did to deserve that). I haven't used it myself for ages, in fact the room of a 15 year old male is too repulsive to contemplate. You'll find a CB much faster through the menus and stuff, that aspect is pretty well governed by the CPU and the 2955 in a CB is far superior to the single core Atom in a Revo 1600. As for playback, the ION hardware is very good under linux (incl openelec of course) and is hard to beat. But I have a celeron 1037u which is inferior to the 2955, and it works very well. Maybe my eyes are too tired, but it looks as good as the ION2 stuff to me. TL;DR - I think it will be an improvement for you! I have no experience with windows with any of these platforms, but get at least 4G RAM if you want windows. There is another thread here somewhere about windows on CB. RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - c0mm0n - 2014-10-22 (2014-09-12, 04:53)Matt Devo Wrote:(2014-09-12, 04:52)c0mm0n Wrote:Might want to wait until I have a chance to play with it first, just to be safe(2014-09-11, 18:45)Matt Devo Wrote: I get that, and it sucks, I'm just saying there's no easy fix for the HP. Many people were wondering if it were a firmware issue or simply a noisy part, and that's not the case. Anyone got it ? Feedback ? (read latest pages haven't found any details bar you we're already up for it, congrats!) Thx for your work, lots of improvements. (Have finally sold the HP... using the NUC i3.) RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - Matt Devo - 2014-10-22 https://plus.google.com/115693545287597955633/posts/UjXZ2SyhVye tl;dr - thermal design closer to HP than Asus, fan noise slightly louder than Asus. 2 sodimm slots, Intel wifi card. No reason to recommend it over the Asus really. RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - aaronb - 2014-10-22 I've been using a 2010 Mac Mini for a few years, but have thought about trying a Chromebox. In the heavier skins I get a little bit of lag scrolling through movies with fanart, nothing excessive, but just enough that I thought maybe I should get something newer and I like to tinker anyways, and the Mac Minis have good resale value. I googled the comparison between the Core 2 Duo in my Mac vs the Celeron 2955 and they were nearly identical in benchmarking, with the C2D coming out just ever so slightly ahead. That made me think maybe it's not worth it. Will the superior Haswell graphics (Mini has Geforce 320M) play a role in speeding it up? With a skin like Aeon Nox is browsing the library as snappy as it gets? RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - Matt Devo - 2014-10-22 FWIW, I've tested many of the common skins, including Aeon Nox, and have never had a single bit of lag or slowdown. Benchmarks are just that, and these Haswell chips are a lot faster than the old Core2 architecture, regardless of what benchmarks say. My old setup was a C2D + Nvidia GT210, and the ChromeBox is faster/better in every aspect. RE: Asus/HP/Acer/Dell ChromeBox EZ Setup (OpenELEC/Linux+XBMC) [v3.0 - 2014/10/16] - aaronb - 2014-10-22 (2014-10-22, 21:30)Matt Devo Wrote: FWIW, I've tested many of the common skins, including Aeon Nox, and have never had a single bit of lag or slowdown. Benchmarks are just that, and these Haswell chips are a lot faster than the old Core2 architecture, regardless of what benchmarks say. My old setup was a C2D + Nvidia GT210, and the ChromeBox is faster/better in every aspect. Excellent, thanks, with two-day Amazon Prime shipping looks like I have a fun project for this weekend |