+- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv)
+-- Forum: Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+--- Forum: Add-on Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=27)
+---- Forum: Service Add-ons (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=152)
+---- Thread: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler (/showthread.php?tid=138745)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
Re: RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - Martijn - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 20:58)Piers Wrote: Well since Martijn has said we're talking about a new thread, rather than starting one, I suggest a new thread is made. Maybe he might be happy to split this posts from this thread into a newly created one. That's up to you, Razze.
Why would you split all this dev stuff? I mean really? Start fresh with current status of script. Do a proper OP again
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - Piers - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 21:02)Martijn Wrote:(2015-02-11, 20:58)Piers Wrote: Well since Martijn has said we're talking about a new thread, rather than starting one, I suggest a new thread is made. Maybe he might be happy to split this posts from this thread into a newly created one. That's up to you, Razze.
Why would you split all this dev stuff? I mean really? Start fresh with current status of script. Do a proper OP again
That's up to Razze, I hope he does.
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - Piers - 2015-02-11
Razze, I've done as you requested - should make it easier to pull now.
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - ketterer - 2015-02-11
Thank You so much, I didn't mean to be to hard on anyone, just wanted to have everything be clear, great work.
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - S7eele - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 19:44)Martijn Wrote: note:
i won't receive notification when mentioned, certainly not when some one can't spell my name correct
my bad, not sure why the other spelling was so set in my mind and i thought notification via @ symbol was standard, ive been using it here often enough [DISAPPOINTED FACE]
(2015-02-11, 20:32)Martijn Wrote: already updated OP with github info. It's not up to me to start a new thread right? Info is just buried because you guys are discussing about starting a new thread or not.understood and apologies for bothering you, just looking for guidance which u provided, get it working then start a new thread, thanks
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - Martijn - 2015-02-11
Normally @ works but I turned it off
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - S7eele - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 20:42)Razze Wrote:(2015-02-11, 20:30)Piers Wrote: I'd like to make a suggestion. I'm not sure if these are trakt-set strings but they've always been terrible. I propose this:
Currently
- Weake Sauce
- Terrible
- Bad
- Poor
- Meh
- Fair
- Good
- Great
- Superb
- Totally Ninja!
Proposed
- 1. Atrocious
- 2. Terrible
- 3. Bad
- 4. Poor
- 5. OK (although "Acceptable" would be better)
- 6. Fair
- 7. Good
- 8. Impressive
- 9. Superb
- 10. Excellent!
Quote:msgctxt "#1314"
msgid "10. Excellent!"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1315"
msgid "1. Atrocious"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1316"
msgid "2. Terrible"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1317"
msgid "3. Bad"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1318"
msgid "4. Poor"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1319"
msgid "5. OK"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1320"
msgid "6. Fair"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1321"
msgid "7. Good"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1322"
msgid "8. Impressive"
msgstr ""
msgctxt "#1323"
msgid "9. Superb"
msgstr ""
These are trakt strings so we shouldn't deviate from them.
fwiw i obviously agree with the statement above and on a personal note the rating names dont bother me
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - S7eele - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 22:04)Martijn Wrote: Normally @ works but I turned it offgood to know, ive tried using it for you, glad to find you havent yet excluded me personally
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - disrupted - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 22:07)S7eele Wrote:(2015-02-11, 20:42)Razze Wrote: These are trakt strings so we shouldn't deviate from them.
fwiw i obviously agree with the statement above and on a personal note the rating names dont bother me
tbh I really like them :D
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - S7eele - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 22:42)freem@n Wrote:i do to really, guess i was just saying i wouldnt be devastated if they went away, not that they will as long as they are used by trakt, 'totally ninja' and 'weak sauce', love em(2015-02-11, 22:07)S7eele Wrote:(2015-02-11, 20:42)Razze Wrote: These are trakt strings so we shouldn't deviate from them.
fwiw i obviously agree with the statement above and on a personal note the rating names dont bother me
tbh I really like them
p.s. - it hits me that age probably has a lot to do with the preference lol
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - Piers - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 22:45)S7eele Wrote:(2015-02-11, 22:42)freem@n Wrote:i do to really, guess i was just saying i wouldnt be devastated if they went away lol(2015-02-11, 22:07)S7eele Wrote: fwiw i obviously agree with the statement above and on a personal note the rating names dont bother me
tbh I really like them
Personally I'd rather have zero words and just numbers.
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - S7eele - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 22:46)Piers Wrote:with the right skills and a little time it seems it would be fairly easy to make it an option, am i mistaken wrt the 'fairly easy' part? however that might be out of scope, just thoughts(2015-02-11, 22:45)S7eele Wrote:(2015-02-11, 22:42)freem@n Wrote: tbh I really like themi do to really, guess i was just saying i wouldnt be devastated if they went away lol
Personally I'd rather have zero words and just numbers.
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - mikeSiLVO - 2015-02-11
(2015-02-11, 22:54)S7eele Wrote: with the right skills and a little time it seems it would be fairly easy to make it an option, am i mistaken wrt the 'fairly easy' part? however that might be out of scope, just thoughts
Making it an option not so easy but something pretty easy is forking the script and change the parts referenced in Piers earlier post and you could have it say whatever you'd like
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - Razze - 2015-02-12
(2015-02-11, 22:45)S7eele Wrote:(2015-02-11, 22:42)freem@n Wrote:i do to really, guess i was just saying i wouldnt be devastated if they went away, not that they will as long as they are used by trakt, 'totally ninja' and 'weak sauce', love em(2015-02-11, 22:07)S7eele Wrote: fwiw i obviously agree with the statement above and on a personal note the rating names dont bother me
tbh I really like them
p.s. - it hits me that age probably has a lot to do with the preference lol
Like em too, even if I'm a little bit younger.
But i'm a little bit concerned about them being in the translation file. The german translation for weak sauce is pretty stupid and thats probably true for every rating. As there is no translated version of trakt.
RE: [RELEASE] trakt.tv tv/movie scrobbler - disrupted - 2015-02-12
(2015-02-12, 00:01)Razze Wrote: Like em too, even if I'm a little bit younger.
But i'm a little bit concerned about them being in the translation file. The german translation for weak sauce is pretty stupid and thats probably true for every rating. As there is no translated version of trakt.
I wouldn't try to translate these rating strings as they aren't translated on the trakt website either. and of course you're right - the german translation would sound ridiculous