(2012-10-17, 23:17)Hack_kid Wrote: yeah dude its the solid state

---

heres finished version with user variable and i got rid of startx since xinit does the same thing ?

Code:

# xbmc-upstart
# starts XBMC on startup by using xinit.
# by default runs as xbmc, to change edit below.
env USER=xbmc

description     "XBMC-barebones-upstart-script"
author          "Matt Filetto"

start on (filesystem and stopped udevtrigger)
stop on runlevel [016]

# tell upstart to respawn the process if abnormal exit
respawn

script
  exec su -c "xinit /usr/bin/xbmc --standalone :0" $USER
end script

(2012-10-18, 05:46)PANiCnz Wrote: Does this script support libcec?

(2012-10-18, 02:14)uNiversal Wrote: Where can we + someone Cant see it

(2012-10-18, 02:14)uNiversal Wrote:

(2012-10-17, 23:17)Hack_kid Wrote: yeah dude its the solid state

---

heres finished version with user variable and i got rid of startx since xinit does the same thing ?

Code:

# xbmc-upstart
# starts XBMC on startup by using xinit.
# by default runs as xbmc, to change edit below.
env USER=xbmc

description     "XBMC-barebones-upstart-script"
author          "Matt Filetto"

start on (filesystem and stopped udevtrigger)
stop on runlevel [016]

# tell upstart to respawn the process if abnormal exit
respawn

script
  exec su -c "xinit /usr/bin/xbmc --standalone :0" $USER
end script

This is great work, not only eliminating the idle startx middle-man, if only we can control start | Stop | restart not via /etc/init.d/ stop but rather stop | start | restart xbmc, as well as making sure xbmc is starting at the correct TTY like it was already said., I think the other did this too., its useful if you want to compile or have multiple xbmc installs ++++1 the hack-kid strikes again! Good work man.

Where can we + someone Cant see it

I digress.

uNi

(2012-10-18, 11:27)uNiversal Wrote: @Hack_kid the TTY thing was a comment by jbravo a few posts back http://forum.xbmc.org/showthread.php?tid=141369&pid=1216467#pid1216467 if it does how he says then maybe its worth looking at it, if not, ignore it.

I didn't know that the start stop was supported directly via this because, well there's no entries for it, to my versy untrained eye, but if you say it does, I believe u.

Stuff with desktop on usually behaves very different, its just an observation