(2016-03-09, 20:13)7007h4k32 Wrote: Yes, I read the sticky at the beginning of the post!

Everyone's responses to my comment is helping me to understand the situation better. My question about "Team Kodi" is based on the fact that Youtube, as well as dozens of other plugins, are referred to as "Official Kodi Addons". And then this designation is followed by the disclaimer, "Although this is the official Kodi repository we take no liability for any of these Add-ons written by 3rd parties. We are not responsible for their content or application. Any problems please post in the forum thread or contact the foundation".

It seems to me that you cannot have it both ways: it is "official" yet Kodi accepts no responsibility. I guess what this means is that an addon has to "pass muster" before being admitted to the repository, but that is as far as it goes.

Thanks to Team Kodi for providing a dynamic framework for accessing content which is open source!

(2016-03-09, 23:20)rodalpho Wrote: Actually, I believe Bromix developed this addon from scratch. There was a previous "official" YouTube addon, but it used a different codebase. So when that developer stepped away, his addon was abandoned and Bromix took over.

And yes, thanks to everybody working on it! I did not mean to diminish your help in any way.

(2016-03-09, 23:31)J876 Wrote: What about other "Official" repositories like the ones the Linux distributions have?

The majority of the software written by people and companies on those repositories are not supported by the OS maker. They do some testing, but
not to the level that the persons who wrote the software has to do.

The Kodi Official Repository is the same. The addon maker needs to be contacted to get support first.

(2016-03-09, 05:02)misty01 Wrote: @DjDiabolik:

I am not going to explain the entire code change, only the basic concept.

CUT CUT.

(2016-03-10, 02:06)DjDiabolik Wrote:

(2016-03-09, 05:02)misty01 Wrote: @DjDiabolik:

I am not going to explain the entire code change, only the basic concept.

CUT CUT.

I do not quote your full reply at this point.......... it's all clearly... but at this point i thinks there's present a bug.... the current login_client.py it's:

Code:

'youtube-for-kodi-16': {
            'system': 'Jarvis',
            'key': '%s' % api_key,
            'id': '%s.apps.googleusercontent.com' % api_id,
            'secret': '%s' % api_secret

At this point the id it's -> youtube.api.id (picked from setting.xml) + '.apps.gooogleusercontent.com'


It's not wrong put the % api_id after the apps.googleuser parts ??

Or in phyton if you want to "add" two variables will need to order at reverse order ?

(2016-03-10, 16:05)Julipo Wrote: Will be some of the fixed versions added to the official repo? Or we will need to install manually one of the fixed versions?

(2016-03-06, 11:41)Kolifanes Wrote: @misty01
https://github.com/Kolifanes/plugin.video.youtube/releases/tag/5.1.20.4
Done

We have only one key is from Google. YouTube TV. But appreciate your solution.

(2016-03-10, 18:42)misty01 Wrote: @amcfarla

kodi/userdata/addon_data/plugin.video.youtube/settings.xml