(2015-05-10, 10:01)r0r5ch4ch Wrote: What should Cinema Experience do and how do I get it to work?

(2015-05-11, 10:36)dictaphone Wrote: I really miss the option to have more view types in advanced launcher (for my emulators), since I'm not really fond of using the list view anywhere and the thumbnail view doesn't look as gorgeous as the available views does for the movies/tv shows/music. not sure if there is any other way than modding it yourself to use other views? I mean, I might have missed something. been years since I used xbmc/kodi, but this skin got me going again and working on a new htpc.

(2015-05-11, 16:01)DruTheFu Wrote: jurial,

What are the possibilities that there can be some collaboration with you (your skin) and some of the custom versions of your skin, and adding some of the great features/setting options to your original version that you maintain? I love using your skin, and being in the repo, I like the no hassle auto updates. Seeing some of the mods spring up based on your skin, I'm seeing some nice features and options being added that I think would add to what you've already started. I'd like to have the access to some of these, but I like the ease of updates with the original.

Things like the built in skin color setting selection for text and highlights, spruced up file information logos instead of text (like ratio, DTS, 5.1, etc) which give the appearance of a more official look, and the transparency of the header/footer. Not being a skinner, I'm not sure the ease of adding these things to the skin, but they seem like they can be feature settings that can be added within 'furniture' or another setting plane to be accessible by the user to use or not use.

What are your thoughts?

(2015-05-12, 12:42)jurialmunkey Wrote: Colour picker added on latest git.

(2015-05-12, 08:06)jurialmunkey Wrote: Codec logos have already been discussed extensively. Dont have an interest in adding that - This skin is intentionally minimalist. Also, they are too inconsistent in size/shape and I'm not a fan of the alternative of placing them in boxes. Plus they just bloat the file size of the skin and I simply just don't really like the look of them compared to text.

(2015-05-12, 22:21)nlash Wrote:

(2015-05-12, 08:06)jurialmunkey Wrote: Codec logos have already been discussed extensively. Dont have an interest in adding that - This skin is intentionally minimalist. Also, they are too inconsistent in size/shape and I'm not a fan of the alternative of placing them in boxes. Plus they just bloat the file size of the skin and I simply just don't really like the look of them compared to text.

Agreed.