NFS is a Samba replacement? - Printable Version +- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +--- Forum: General Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +---- Forum: OS independent / Other (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=228) +---- Thread: NFS is a Samba replacement? (/showthread.php?tid=371329) |
NFS is a Samba replacement? - heysoundude - 2023-01-16 For those of us less network/technically minded, what's the big deal about NFS as mentioned here ? is it faster/safer/more secure? where do we go to set it up? RE: NFS is a Samba replacement? - Klojum - 2023-01-16 NFS is just another file protocol like SMB/Samba, but is more commonly used on Linux systems. The protocol has slightly less overhead, so "could" be a tiny bit faster. But as always, your mileage may vary on your own network setup. For some people SMB works better, for others NFS will. RE: NFS is a Samba replacement? - scott967 - 2023-01-17 I think NFS came about in the Unix System V days via Sun. There was an improved follow-on AFS but that didn't seem to become popular. Samba was never intended to be routed while NFS uses common TCP/UDP as its transport and is a defined internet standard (RFC). Samba is really derived from the old MS LANMAN days as a competitor to Novell Netware. In typical BG/MS fashion it was designed to lock you into MS. scott s. . RE: NFS is a Samba replacement? - heysoundude - 2023-01-17 Thanks both. I'm sure there are interesting possibilities for this that will become clear in time. |