![]() |
quick question about <visible> tag - Printable Version +- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +--- Forum: Skins Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=67) +--- Thread: quick question about <visible> tag (/showthread.php?tid=56212) |
quick question about <visible> tag - azido - 2009-08-12 so, will this: <visible>Skin.HasSetting(mainmenu_1)+Skin.HasSetting(mainmenu_2)+Skin.HasSetting(mainmenu_3)</visible> work the same way as using <visible>Skin.HasSetting(mainmenu_1)</visible> <visible>Skin.HasSetting(mainmenu_2)</visible> <visible>Skin.HasSetting(mainmenu_3)</visible> or is there a difference (functionality, speed-wise, you name it) ? which of them should be preferrable? - jmarshall - 2009-08-12 They're effectively identical. The only difference is the second adds brackets around the expressions, which I could perhaps add a very slight overhead (I can't recall offhand how the reverse polish thing works). - azido - 2009-08-12 thanks, jonathan. i kept the example simple for a reason. my real intention was to find out if a really long line of conditions has an impact in working for a skin like <visible>this+that+this+something+someother+blah+blubb+bleeeh+more+haha+lookatmei'macondidtion+iwanttobreakfree+azidorocks+so+on</visible> especially if there are many of them in a kinda big xml. jmarshall Wrote:(I can't recall offhand how the reverse polish thing works). i have to admit that, although in general my english is really good: i don't understand this phrase. Even when i use google to translate.. ![]() - topkat - 2009-08-12 I think he means this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_Polish_notation |