Posts: 4
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation:
0
i just registered on the forum to thank you for the great job on porting g-force to xmbc, it looks really amazing!
why do you leave the default res on 320x288? i'm running 720x576 here on my pal 16:9 and it plays super-smooth :-)
thanks again!
Posts: 5,008
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation:
30
pike
Team Kodi Admin
Posts: 5,008
it's @ that resolution because when it was added to cvs it wasn't as fluent in 720x576. (perhaps 10fps)
yesterday a bug was solved which doubled the speed.
i dont think it runs in full speed at this high resolution either, i estimate ~20fps, smooth would be 25 or 30 fps.
Posts: 4
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation:
0
strange thing is: 640x480 is not smooth at all
but 720x576 is very smooth
is there a way to see the fps?
Posts: 5,008
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation:
30
pike
Team Kodi Admin
Posts: 5,008
not yet, but i believe questor is working on that <hint, hint>
Posts: 117
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
0
how are you guys changing the resolution from 320x288 to 720x576 ?
Posts: 27
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation:
0
nmrs
Junior Member
Posts: 27
maybe rather than having questor add framerate to g-force, it should be added to xbmc itself, that way all vis's could benefit from it. a bool could just be added to vis_info struct:
struct vis_info
{
bool bwantsfreq;
int isyncdelay;
bool bdisplayframerate;
};
that way vis's themselves could still determine whether it was being shown (probably from setting in xml), but all vis maker's wouldn't have to duplicate this code.
(i'm cross posting this in the visualization plug-in interface forum)
read the xbmc
online-manual,
faq and
search the forums before posting! do not e-mail the xbmc-team asking for support!
read/follow the
forum rules! note! team-xbmc never have and never will host or distribute ms-xdk binaries/executables!