2013-03-23, 01:56
(2013-03-23, 01:17)nickr Wrote: DLNA would obviously involve less wiring, but I wonder if the network latency would make the audio out of sync with the video, even assuming we can get the audio streaming to dlna working?Correct me if I am wrong, but the XBMC player has an audio latency adjustment on it for just such eventualities. I know that some other Linux players do.
Quote:I have never seen the point in wiring like that given my reliance on media PCs in each room, but I know it is common.Prior to recent advancements in sending digital media over a network, how else are you going to send the same source material to multiple zones ? Lets say you want to play "Jingle Bells" at your Christmas party on the kitchen speakers (zone 1), dining room speakers (zone 2) and great room speakers (zone 3), at the same time. Its easy when they are all wired to the same location.
And it makes way more sense to send line level signal rather than pre amp level signals for reasons already mentioned.
I'd say that more than 50% of new houses are wired for sound in multiple zones and almost all of them are wired to a common location, ie to use whole house amplifiers.
Quote:Perhpas this helps? https://live.gnome.org/Rygel - there are rygel plugins for pulseaudio.
I'm in discussions on the mailing list with rygel people on this very topic.