Posts: 301
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
0
I'm still struggling with tvheadend on the odroid. It sees my hdhomerun boxes fine, but makes a mess when it does the service mapping. I'm wondering if it's because Xenial (16.04) isn't officially supported. I'd really like to get this working though, so I'll keep at it.
Sent from my Moto G (4)
Experience: It's what you get when you were expecting something else.
Posts: 301
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
0
In my personal experience with tvheadend, I couldn't get it to "just work". I don't know if the problems stem from using Xenial or the hdhomerun boxes, but I couldn't get it to put together a usable set of service mappings. It seemed to scan fine, but when mapping services I kept ending up with duplicates and far more alleged services than actually exist. I tried all kinds of variations on the settings, but always ended up facing issues. I suppose that I could have manually massaged the results into something usable, nut that just didn't feel right for something that is supposed to be easy. I figured that id just wait until Xenial was officially supported and try again. Just a guess, but it smells like something may be embedded in the streams that is confusing the software into thinking that other muxes might contain alternative copies of the services/channels.
Sent from my Moto G (4)
Experience: It's what you get when you were expecting something else.
Posts: 806
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
33
It is common for a service to be present on more than one mux. And Tvheadend will always require more configuration than most other backends, but that's because of the way its architecture is designed; having a deb packaged for Ubuntu won't change that.
Posts: 19,982
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
452
nickr
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 19,982
I have been using myth for years, and find setup simple. I havent ever been able to get tvh working properly.
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Posts: 806
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
33
I never thought TVH was simple. It's quite a pain to setup, but I have found that it has much lower overhead and is much more stable and consistent than MythTV ever was.
MythTV 0.27 was more stable than 0.28, and the transition to Qt5 was a bit of a disaster. Plus, the inclusion of he WebFrontend in its half-finished state, made the upgrade a bit of a hassle ... Especially since there have been so many bugs in Qt5.
In any case, this thread has devolved from its original purpose. My C2 is now the development platform for a new frontend, and my backend has migrated to i3, albeit running TVH.