(2024-08-14, 19:52)SignFinder Wrote: Thanks for this explanation.
It is a pity because dlna looks better comparing SMB.
For example - Kodi smoothly shows big size 4k mkv files from internal DLNA server on Zyxel Keenetic routers, but the same files are shown with interruptions via SMB share.
To be honest I do not understand the differences between SMB and ordinary DLNA servers - both just giving Kodi "url" SMB:\\ or upnp:\\ with the list of files, and Kodi scans them using one of available plugins like the movie database or TMDb TV Shows.
Ordinary DLNA servers do not have any additional information like Plex - they just scan folder and prepare list of files and folders inside.
There are some DLNA servers out there which have full rich metadata libraries, built-in scrapers, offer the ability for custom media types (including defining your own), work well with Kodi, support non-Kodi access/clients and much much more. I have many other media types such as video, Home Movie, Radio Station, Personal and more. Unfortunately there are many more DLNA servers out there which are pretty basic UPnP servers.
I would avoid basic DLNA servers which still use upnp vs. http / https as the transport. I have typically found that many of those (not all) tend to offer a much more limited set of media metadata and artwork. I've spent quite a bit of time debugging UPnP server XML metadata the
Mezzmo Kodi addon. I try to support as many as I can but there are limits. Kodi is a notable exception here but as has been pointed out has limits, including not supporting images / pictures due to not having an imaqe library / database.
I concur with you that a better quality DLNA server, with the right setup, and that offer a
GUI mode browsing in addition to Kodi's native mode is preferable. I've been running this way for almost 10 years with a 15+ various DLNA clients (over half are Kodi) all using DLNA vs. SMB sharing. It has worked extremely well for me and with almost 0 maintenance.
Thanks,
Jeff