2012-06-06, 12:26
(2012-06-06, 11:15)john.doe Wrote: Wow, you make it sound so easy. "Just fix RottenTomatoes". Yeah, let's all fix the nearly 1 million movies listed at RT, going through them one by one and ensuring that they all have an IMDb link. Geeze. Sounds so easy when you put it like that.I already did all my movies on themoviedb.org
Call me when you are done with that.
Including tagging the posters with the correct language. So that accounts for 1500 of them.
Who says you need to do them all yourselves? Nobody said such a thing. You can just start by doing your own collection for starters.
Quote:ACTUALLY SOLVE THE ISSUE AND CREATE A USABLE SCRAPER INSTEAD OF DREAMING ABOUT MANUALLY EDITING THE METADATA OF NEARLY A MILLION MOVIES AT RT.Why not ask RT to fix it theirselves. Their could easily write the same code so compare their site with IMDB or TMDB and fix anything that is missing. No manual editing involved. They can fix their data way better/faster and easier than we can.
Quote:The last point is the most important one.In an ideal world, we could fix RT and link every single movie to its IMDb ID, but in reality it's just too much work. So by doing this very accurate workaround, we'd have an accurate scraper either way. In fact the scraper could log messages suggesting that the person contributes the IMDb <-> RT connection it has found for each movie where no such connection existed.
Like already said by olympia. This is currently not possible within scrapers. Perhaps nearing the final release of Frodo something like this could be done.
So lets put this to rest in this thread (or create another one in the scraper section) and start talking about the scraper itself again