2012-08-30, 20:54
I don't know if I understand you correctly, but I'll give it a try, correct me if I undestood something wrong.
As I see it' there's a couple of differences.
MakeMKV puts the different tracks (video, audio, subs, chapters) in a MKV container, that's the biggest advantage over DVD Decrypter imo.
You can run MakeMKV automated in a script.
I personally see no reason to compress and get worse quality when I've payed money for a movie.
(2012-08-29, 20:23)tim619 Wrote: I tried MakeMKV, but it just puts the dvd files in a MKV container so there is no difference between freeware dvd decrypter unless
you can run dvddecrypter automated.
As I see it' there's a couple of differences.
MakeMKV puts the different tracks (video, audio, subs, chapters) in a MKV container, that's the biggest advantage over DVD Decrypter imo.
You can run MakeMKV automated in a script.
(2012-08-29, 20:23)tim619 Wrote: handbrake can copy dvd too but without css decrypting. i heard that its possible with libdvdcssI haven't used Handbrake, but as I've understood it you myst reencode with Handbrake since it can't make a 1:1 copy.
(which is included in xbmc) maybe spinalcrack could take a look if i am right
I personally see no reason to compress and get worse quality when I've payed money for a movie.