2013-09-14, 18:06
Now that the freezing issue has been resolved, retroplayer is working fairly awesomely. I'm just throwing out a suggestion. What if we only shipped with a maximum of two emulators per platform, rather than 5 to 7? My assumption is that people simply don't have the inclination to go look up what the best emulator is, and they certainly won't try out multiple emulators, if the first one breaks a lot.
So why not do the work for them, identify two emulators least likely to break (categories:"most accurate" for powerful machines and "fastest" for embedded and low power machines), and then give them the option of selecting between those two?
How we identify the best emulators could be a bit tricky. The obvious solution is to provide users an opt-in call home function that reports on breakage during the beta period, though I know there are those who oppose call home functions even when they are opt in and even when they are only for beta periods.
Anyway, just a thought.
So why not do the work for them, identify two emulators least likely to break (categories:"most accurate" for powerful machines and "fastest" for embedded and low power machines), and then give them the option of selecting between those two?
How we identify the best emulators could be a bit tricky. The obvious solution is to provide users an opt-in call home function that reports on breakage during the beta period, though I know there are those who oppose call home functions even when they are opt in and even when they are only for beta periods.
Anyway, just a thought.