2014-01-17, 15:44
Why do you crosspost this so heavily?
(2014-01-17, 15:44)Memphiz Wrote: Why do you crosspost this so heavily?I wouldn't think that linking here from a that other thread with similar discussion with only a quote of my first post in about Miracast could be classified as "heavily cross-posting"?
Quote:ask a moderator to merge it together.@All forum mods, can a forum moderator please merge some or most Miracast forums thread together into one thread?
(2014-02-19, 21:30)Hedda Wrote:Quote:ask a moderator to merge it together.That is, there might be more but there are only three scenarios that I can think of so perhaps merge all to only three threads
1. Users want XBMC to somehow act as a Miracast / WFD transceiver and mirror XBMC's full GUI/videos to a Chromecast and other WFD receiver, as a source to other Miracast / WFD / Chromecast players
2. Users want XBMC to act as a Miracast / WFD receiver, and users basically want XBMC to emulate a Chromecast on then network, as a Miracast / WFD / Chromecast compatible player.
3. Users want XBMC to to run natively on a Chromecast
(2014-02-19, 22:17)nickr Wrote:I know that, but others may not since it is really only explained in maybe 1 out of those 20+ threads that discuss Miracast / WFD / Chromecast today.(2014-02-19, 21:30)Hedda Wrote:Like most open source stuff, this essentially means either (1) you need to find a user who knows how to code and who wants these features, or (2) you need to find an existing team member who is interested enough in these features to want to code it.Quote:ask a moderator to merge it together.That is, there might be more but there are only three scenarios that I can think of so perhaps merge all to only three threads
1. Users want XBMC to somehow act as a Miracast / WFD transceiver and mirror XBMC's full GUI/videos to a Chromecast and other WFD receiver, as a source to other Miracast / WFD / Chromecast players
2. Users want XBMC to act as a Miracast / WFD receiver, and users basically want XBMC to emulate a Chromecast on then network, as a Miracast / WFD / Chromecast compatible player.
3. Users want XBMC to to run natively on a Chromecast
(2013-06-28, 19:48)aptalca Wrote: issues with miracast are mostly due to the hardware component and requirements
it is based on intel's wifi-direct for wireless displays
it is not a software only solution like apple's airplay
the devices have to have a direct wi-fi connection to each other, it doesn't work over lan
it really baffles me that google decided to back such a limiting platform
(2015-01-29, 01:48)kormsbee Wrote: I dont believe that to be true. I have a samsung tv thats plugged into ethernet and i can miracast to it just fine.
(2013-06-28, 19:48)aptalca Wrote: issues with miracast are mostly due to the hardware component and requirements
it is based on intel's wifi-direct for wireless displays
it is not a software only solution like apple's airplay
the devices have to have a direct wi-fi connection to each other, it doesn't work over lan
it really baffles me that google decided to back such a limiting platform
(2014-02-19, 22:17)nickr Wrote:(2014-02-19, 21:30)Hedda Wrote:Quote:ask a moderator to merge it together.That is, there might be more but there are only three scenarios that I can think of so perhaps merge all to only three threads
1. Users want XBMC to somehow act as a Miracast / WFD transceiver and mirror XBMC's full GUI/videos to a Chromecast and other WFD receiver, as a source to other Miracast / WFD / Chromecast players
2. Users want XBMC to act as a Miracast / WFD receiver, and users basically want XBMC to emulate a Chromecast on then network, as a Miracast / WFD / Chromecast compatible player.
3. Users want XBMC to to run natively on a Chromecast
Like most open source stuff, this essentially means either (1) you need to find a user who knows how to code and who wants these features, or (2) you need to find an existing team member who is interested enough in these features to want to code it.
(2013-06-19, 08:33)salil.ra Wrote: Hi,i am not sure if this will work (or if your still doing this project) but this might help https://rtandroid.embedded.rwth-aachen.d...pberry-pi/
We are doing a project to add Miracast support for XBMC for Raspberry Pi. We already spoke to WiFi alliance regarding this and they asked us to buy the technical specifications. So we came up with the following choices to implement Miracast. This is considering that we use Android 4.2's open source code for sink as our reference in each of the approach. Please feel free to give suggestions.
Approaches:
1) XBMC for Android
We were thinking about porting XBMC for Android to Raspberry Pi and use the already existing files for Miracast from Android 4.2.
But we are stuck since there is no Android 4.2 image so far for a Raspberry Pi.
2) XBMC for Raspbian
We can download a Raspiban Wheezy on Raspberry Pi and install XBMC. But for that, developing Miracast functionality would be a difficult since with each change we have to re-build the kernel, which takes a lot of time.
3) Raspbmc
We haven't played with it so far. So can't really comment on this for now.
Which would be the best approach to handle this? Do you suggest other approaches?
We are using the following
1. Raspberry Pi Model B
2. TP-Link WN725N WiFi Dongle
3. Samsung Galaxy S4 (source device)
We are going to host this project on GitHub for other developers to contribute.
Cheers !