Posts: 23,545
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
1,108
fritsch
Team-Kodi Developer
Posts: 23,545
@uuzi: We had that already I think. Your radeon does mpeg-2 on shaders, that are not thread safe. Upgrade to tomorrows version of the fernetmenta-ppa. Go to expert settings under Video Playback and disable MPEG-2 codec in the VDPAU section.
First decide what functions / features you expect from a system. Then decide for the hardware. Don't waste your money on crap.
Posts: 2
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation:
0
2014-06-02, 23:52
(This post was last modified: 2014-06-02, 23:53 by Piticli.)
Since Gotham update of Raspbmc, I have problems with my VDR connection. I have installed a server with yaVDR, and it uses vnsiserver3. Since Gotham, my raspbmc is trying to connect using protocol 5, so it can't connect. I have tried to install vnsiserver5 in yaVDR, but I couldn't do it without have all the packages and dependences broken (I almost had to reinstall all yaVDR to correct it all) because vnsiserver is in testing apt source. So... is it posible to use protocol 3 from client side? (vnsi client from raspbmc with Gotham).
Thanks
Posts: 6,810
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
198
Gotham requires vnsiserver 1.0 or later. Future versions will be less rigid regarding protocol version.
Posts: 2
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation:
0
"vnsiserver 1.0" is equal to "vnsiserver5" ?
Posts: 6,810
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
198
No, they are not equal. vnsiserver5 is version 0.9.x. But both versions use protocol 5 and work with Gotham.
Posts: 6,810
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
198
2014-06-05, 23:16
(This post was last modified: 2014-06-05, 23:17 by FernetMenta.)
Don't mix up things. You compiled vnsi addon from my master, used with Gotham, against on older version of vnsiserver.
- we are working on 14.x and there is no guarantee that m master is compatible with G releases (currently it is but this may change)
- upgrading the client (addon) may require an upgrade of server. -> my master branch of vnsi addon requires vnsiserver 1.1.0. It was supposed to be compatible with 1.0 but due to some bug it compares against a wrong version.
Posts: 10
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation:
0
Hi. I am completly new into this Business. I try To get an pi Running with openelec 4.0.4 connecting To my yavdr 0.5 with stabile sources. I have read in some threads about version of vnsi and protocol but not sure what to do.
With the stable source of yavdr the version of vnsi is to old. In my mind the only version of get vnsi running is to get an alternative source or compile the correct version.
Is here someone who currently running this setup? What would you prefer? What is the correct version / git branch for openelec 4.0.4 Protocol Version 5?
Thanks
Posts: 6,810
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
198
With version 1.1.0 of vnsiserver backwards compatibility is back. This allows that clients with a minimum protocol version of 5 can connect to the server. AFAIK version 1.1.0 is in yaVDR unstable.
Posts: 37
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation:
0
Yep,
PPA yaVDR unstable holds 1.1.0
vdr-plugin-vnsiserver 1.1.0~git20140723-3f11c8e-0yavdr0~trusty seahawk1986 (2014-08-08)
Does it make sense to use this one
or shall I compile from your sources since you are on Version 1.1.0 since May 17th
Thanks for info
Will give it a try tonight
Martin
vdr 2.2.0 (yavdr/unstable-vdr) / TBS 6991 dvbs-2 - Twin Tuner plus CI / vdr-plugin-vnsiserver 1.3.0 (FernetMenta's GIT) / Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Zotac CI520 / kodibuntu 14.04 / Helix 14.1 stable, vdr addon 1.9.23 (Opdenkamp's GIT), Skin Rapier 7.2.0
MacBook Pro / OSX 10.10 / Helix 14.1 stable, vdr addon 1.9.23 (Opdenkamp's GIT), Skin Rapier 7.2.0
MySQL MediaDB
Posts: 6,810
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
198
according to git sha vdr-plugin-vnsiserver 1.1.0~git20140723-3f11c8e-0yavdr0~trusty is identical to current master branch.
Posts: 7
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation:
0
Hi FernetMenta,
I'm using yavdr's repos (unstable) to simplify my tests, so my backend use vdr 2.1.6 + plugin-vnsi-server 1.1.0.
With kodi RC2 as front end, all is working great, but i've some questions:
- handling a dvb-t dongle, vnsi "stream" took about 350kb/s on SD and 700/800kb/s for HD channels. This looks strange to me, expecting a larger data flow (5/9Mbps). Is vnsi plugin compressing the stream ?
Thanks
Posts: 6,810
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
198
vnsi does not touch the stream other than demuxing it. how did you measure bitrate?