2016-07-29, 19:54
I was wondering if anyone else has the same issue I do with the new 'Change Timer Type' feature.
Generally I think it's yet another step in the right direction (keep up the good work @ksooo), but there is one part of it I don't understand.
When a 'manual' timer doesn't have a parent, I can see that being able to edit its type makes sense. You might want to make a 'oneshot' instant record timer a rule so it also records the rest of the series for example....
My issue is with timers which are children of existing timer rules (an 'upcoming' in mythtv terminology).
To my mind, these are events and don't really have a type you can (or should) edit.
It's correct to be able to activate/deactivate, and change start/end padding etc... (where the backend supports it) but not I think to change the type.
Would it be sensible/possible to make the type 'read only' where a timer has a parent timer rule, and to display the correct timer type rather than 'Manual' in this case?
What you really want here is a button which allows you to edit the associated timer rule, but I can see this might not be that easy to accomplish within the current framework.
Unfortunately I don't have much time to code at present otherwise I'd try to mock up something myself.
I'm also a little worried that I just missed the last alpha in the release cycle.....
Generally I think it's yet another step in the right direction (keep up the good work @ksooo), but there is one part of it I don't understand.
When a 'manual' timer doesn't have a parent, I can see that being able to edit its type makes sense. You might want to make a 'oneshot' instant record timer a rule so it also records the rest of the series for example....
My issue is with timers which are children of existing timer rules (an 'upcoming' in mythtv terminology).
To my mind, these are events and don't really have a type you can (or should) edit.
It's correct to be able to activate/deactivate, and change start/end padding etc... (where the backend supports it) but not I think to change the type.
Would it be sensible/possible to make the type 'read only' where a timer has a parent timer rule, and to display the correct timer type rather than 'Manual' in this case?
What you really want here is a button which allows you to edit the associated timer rule, but I can see this might not be that easy to accomplish within the current framework.
Unfortunately I don't have much time to code at present otherwise I'd try to mock up something myself.
I'm also a little worried that I just missed the last alpha in the release cycle.....