Posts: 2
Joined: Mar 2018
Reputation:
0
Isn't the TV License only for BBC programming? I can't find any reference to a requirement for a TV License with ITV anywhere on their site, and the TV Licensing page does mention a ITV in the content of licensing, but only specifies BBC programming.
Posts: 19,982
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
452
nickr
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 19,982
In NZ Sky have a monopoly on major sport, rugby (we are the world champions), cricket, NRL, etcetc. However even with that monopoly they have just had to halve the cost of their basic packages. This is not down to kodi, more likely netflix and some other streamers catering to watchers of good tv, and only sports addicts needing sky.
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Posts: 510
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation:
57
2018-03-17, 14:27
(This post was last modified: 2018-03-18, 04:13 by tjay260476.)
I’ve been reading this intently, and it shows interesting points about us in the ‘official’ community. Somehow I don’t think WE will hit the headlines though.
Here they are:
Our library has been purchased (in the U.K., though, it magically appears on your hard drive by waving the dvd at your pc)
A few of us have Netflix and Prime accounts, again we don’t mind paying.
We also watch BBCiPlayer
We do have a gripe with the BBC tax, I think we can agree that that no issue on paying for the BBC - if you are going to watch it! Personally I only watch it only when Dr Who is on.... £147 even for me is too much to pay!
Netflix and Prime are killing the Sky and the virgins NOT Kodi...
Server: Ubuntu Server 22TB HDD running SAMBA
Kodi: 4 Raspberry Pi 3 running Libreelec - on the main PC - running Linux Mint
My Setup thread |
Posts: 510
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation:
57
I agree in paying for the BBC, I don’t think the way we pay for it now is right for the 21st Century and beyond.... it worked when there was less TV channels, and no Sky/Netflix etc, however, tech has changed, and the licensing model needs to be updated.
I for one agree that we shouldn’t have the US model as I watched a US program complete with ads once (Hulu via vpn). I lasted 1/2 hour!
Now that the license also covers IPlayer, looks like the BBC are going to shift to a different model, one hopes...
Server: Ubuntu Server 22TB HDD running SAMBA
Kodi: 4 Raspberry Pi 3 running Libreelec - on the main PC - running Linux Mint
My Setup thread |
Posts: 1,746
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
160
docwra
Posting Freak
Posts: 1,746
2018-03-17, 22:40
(This post was last modified: 2018-03-17, 22:41 by docwra.)
I used to pay for Sky, found it a pretty good service overall but got bored of the same interface and poor quality remote. I also realized I was only really interested in the Live Sport.
Another thing that frustrated me was not being able to access my recordings on different devices. This was probably the deal breaker for me.
I don't use Kodi to stream anything and I pay for Netflix and Amazon Prime subscriptions and have a TV license. that I have no issue with whatsoever. I access these all through my Kodi box including live TV that I can stream all around the house without cables.
I play my own ripped media including music, movies and TV shows that I record from TV.
Overall the reason I use Kodi most is because I can modify it to my liking, and have complete freedom of my own media.