Posts: 2
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
0
2018-05-10, 02:37
(This post was last modified: 2018-05-10, 02:41 by ava!.)
So many features, and so few I will ever need, want, ask for, care-about or use.
This program has one real use - to quickly find and a play a video in one's collection, and somehow there is no longer a default thumbnail view?
It's almost NeoLiberal in how it has missed the point. I will NEVER go into this program to check the weather or play music, (my weather widget and iTunes do those things much faster and don't block my whole-desktop).
It's like when you take a family picture to a fancy frame-shop and walk out with coated, archival glass, quadruple matting, gold-leafed frame and you suddenly realize that your original picture is now like 10% of what the adventure mutated into.
If you want to go "KDE Plasma" with it and take 4-cores and a videocard to do what can normally be done on an iPod shuffle - good for you, but you should also offer a Vanilla option that just gets to the point - like XBMC Eden did years ago.
Posts: 2
Joined: May 2018
Reputation:
0
Very well but they would not go amiss by starting off with the stuff people want, ready to go, rather than giving them all the stuff nobody asked for to start with and adding the 'core' later as an addon. Kinda like going to by a car and getting the seat-covers and fuzzy-dice a year before the car is built. There are THREE threads about missing "thumbnail view" on the first page of the the interface discussion. Don't be coy, you all are trying to TELL US what we should want, rather than listening to what we actually want.
We can go in an rebuild the entire thing: bigger, stronger, faster (and actually useful) "We have the technology", but it's presumptuous to expect us to to watch a video. Google is best when it does what we want (CHROME and SEARCH) and all that other crap is kinda' a distraction.
Posts: 100
Joined: May 2007
Reputation:
1
Whenever I feel this way about opensource projects, I roll up my sleeves, write some code, and contribute the features that I want.
I guess others complain.
What a shame.
Posts: 5,487
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
385
"Playing a video in one's collection" is rapidly becoming a niche activity, sort of like playing a vinyl record in one's collection. The exception is for high-quality video, and that takes more computing power and a better video player element, which is a focus of developement.
Keep in mind also, XBMC/Kodi is aimed at the 10 foot entertainment UX, not a desktop, so unifying various media into a common UX is not IMHO a bloat, but a prime feature.
scott s.
.
Posts: 510
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation:
57
2018-05-10, 05:02
(This post was last modified: 2018-05-10, 05:09 by tjay260476.)
Bloatware?
Am I using a different version to the rest of the world? My copy only came with local playback features, and not a large file at all, (200MB tops) PVR, catchup TV and YouTube are all addons....
This as far as I remember was XBMC when it first came out, a player for local playback, and unless you want ‘advanced features’ you install addons.
It still gets its tv and movies metadata from external sources.... am I wrong but is this still the same software as all those years ago?
Server: Ubuntu Server 22TB HDD running SAMBA
Kodi: 4 Raspberry Pi 3 running Libreelec - on the main PC - running Linux Mint
My Setup thread |
Posts: 10,779
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
673
jjd-uk
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 10,779
I suspect your issues are down to the new default skin Estuary, if you preferred the Eden default look which used the Confluence skin then that is still available from the Add-on repo.
Posts: 28
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation:
0
Daily Kodi user from Camelot. Can make it my own since day 1 with addons (although I mostly use the Youtube one).
To the question 'is Kodi bloated', I would simply not feed the troll.
Kudos team ;-)
Posts: 14,208
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation:
711
Klojum
Lost connection
Posts: 14,208
2018-05-11, 18:44
(This post was last modified: 2018-05-12, 19:50 by Klojum.)
I guess we've reached the end of the general conclusion, also because our OP hasn't bothered to react any further.
If you like Kodi, then use it. If you don't like Kodi, use something else.