I'm not one to turn down advice, especially when it comes from @
CrystalP.
Based on the last message, I can now say that my KODI devices will wake my NAS Server. The workaround worked.
1) FIRST - I verified that everything on the NAS server (name, IP address, MAC, workgroup, etc) were what I thought that they were.
2) With my NAS server on, I went into KODI, and selected wake server
3) As before, MAC address discovery failed for server name (ZebServer) and IP Address (192.168.15.14), and when it fails MAC discovery, no WOL.xml file is created.
4) I left Wake Server button selected, and then exited KODI.
5) I found an old back-up copy of KODI and copied the WOL.xml file. I verified that server name, IP address and MAC address were correct, and then moved it into the userdata folder.
6) I changed the power settings in my Win11 NAS to sleep after three hours. And then I put my server to sleep.
7) I restarted the Kodi device, and KODI WOL woke the NAS server.
Great !!! WHOO-HOO !!! (Confetti falls from the ceiling in celebration.)
HOWEVER.....
In a former life, I was a Consulting SE for Cisco. So me, and networks... pretty OK. And now, we spend time split between Colorado and Florida. (mountains/ beach, of course).
And this issue of not being able to discover the MAC address for the Win11 NAS server happened in BOTH networks (CO & FL). I say that, because I really don't think it is in any way related to the network. While both are set up in the same way ( ISP end device --> one fixed IP address --> local owned router doing DHCP --> NAS server w/ static IP address), there is different equipment in both locations. So, likely not the network.
AND... as CrystalP said: on her system, she could not recreate the issue.
So, that leaves two things:
1) Win11 doing something weird & different, or...
2) The NIC choosing not to share the MAC address with others.
A good test would be to put a different network card into the NAS server and see if that different card and different driver would fix the issue completely... but at this point... it's a bit of "who cares", as it is working as I hoped.
CrystalP, I do want to thank you for making the suggestion which will allow me to save power and not run the server needlessly.
I really appreciate the time that you shared.